the Diferential of trueth Texts of Genesis and the Book Not inspirated of Enoch.

When studys  the Central  texts of  the {Berichit } in  the lenguage Hebrew Genesis is the firts Book contextuals in Order inspirated original and not the Nexts Texts of Deutor-Canonicus of Enoch.  ¿ why  in texts of Genesis have Menthion the Name of the just Enoch.  well for on inspirated Reason  and  is . the Nexts  the texts of the Genesis is on longs Coopilation inspirated in the Pentateucus and the Canoom Hebrews  and have on Resumend of the fiedl history of the just Enoch the nexts Differentail is that the  odl Rabinus and Eclesiaticals Phater of Churth protestantics and the Romen Catolicals Comunitys . Not acept the Seudo Canoom in the Scripture Hebrew and aramea classic. is  on texts    of Origings apocrifus  not is in valors original of Canoom in isreal in the actuallitys . and others texts in spareation and exclutions of Canoom in singles words  the Book of Enochs speaking of the Criatures that livings in heavens . and the rebelions. of Angels.  in Really in personal Studies my person in perspectived analited the Book of Enoch  incluyings the Eminent Historian Joshepus flaviuos  Not have mentions in the  firts texts and  in Nexts Tomus in the Book odl jhewits  in the firts and Sincerity studies of theology biblical internationals. the texts of Enoch is Not inspirated. and Not acept in the Canoom odl. intry  the  Priets

 and   Eminent  Pastors and Rabinus. in the actuallitys  when the texts of Genesis speak of Son of the God trueth  not have alutions to the Criatures Celestials. in the lenguage Original Hebrew of texts . Note the texts of Enoch not is inspirated in Relatives  options . in the  not aceptation for manys of ones 10 Centurys to ours longs periods.in history of Century XXI. the Canoom of texts of Enoch is Excluided intry the history of the Sinodus in The Great Churth of the Rome  in the consultains of  the  Experts  Studies Compartives intry the Hebrews texts inspirateds of Genesis and the Enoch in the longs Days of Constatinus.the Great in the  firts  Exclutions.of its types of Books. Not  acept in formation inspirated in theOriginals  Standars of the Holys Scriptures in year 314-315 D E C yeah in my humility vocation in the  Question  of its Series of Book and Texts ¿  why  my humility Answer  is the Nexts the Sinodus in the Revision of Canoom  and Consideration, of the odl texts in Book of Enoch  how on texts explain Confucess for the firts phaters of Rome . and denegated in the Ecences total. when Constantinus . view its texts in Order of Revistion .in  the Sinodus Eclesial  not the acept in the Relation to  the Angels. of the heavens only for  the  Respect to figured Divine. of Creator Note the texts of the just Enoch apocrifus .in the lecttures existing parages of the Book Genesis. for other part theRabinus not acept for the Criatures contradictorial in  the  Act Sexual. and Contrdictory toEyes of the God. is on Book apocrifus and  Excluides.